Take two blank sheets of paper.Take any two humans in the world.Assume you have no understanding of what a human is.Note down each and every attribute of both the human beings.Now , if a percentage comparison is done between the sheets , what would be the similariy percentage.Above 95 % atleast?? Does a particular person's individuality contribute more to him than the basics( his systems ) . I doubt it.How is it that this consistency is maintained?Why is it that this consistency is maintained?
What is a question?What is understanding? Animals think too.Do plants think?Plants probably don't think.The cells within them react to conditions like sunlight.Take inanimate objects , a pile of stones , push the stone in the bottom , the pile falls over.There is no thought involved here.However , there is a consequence. For things to happen , thought is not required.Thought is not fundamental to nature.
Thought did not bring about the rivers , the mountains , the earth is not a product of thought and earth is a lot.It is the same old question that I am backtracking to.Why is it that there is a universe?I am not thinking about how it started.I am thinking why it started?
There does not have to be a why to it?When I think about how life might have originated a, ll I am doing is recalling things taught to me at school , started with amoeba , micorscopic organisms and then the cell with the nucleus and then the tissue , invertebrates , vertebrates etc. Why this compelling urge to further life?Why is that all of us could not just be amoebae dividing themselves?
